Faculty Fellowship - De. Pauw University. Online form. A faculty member may receive a Faculty Fellowship more than once during his or her career; however, there must be a minimum of one year between the awards. During a Faculty Fellowship faculty members may not apply for a Fisher Fellowship or a Fisher Course Reassignment. For complete details about overlapping Faculty Development awards and other University recognitions, please see the table under . The projects may be related but each project should have a distinct product. The specific details of each arrangement for the reassigned time will be developed by the faculty member in consultation with the department chair and the Vice President for Academic Affairs. Recipients of Faculty Fellowships must also continue to fulfill normal expectations of teaching effectiveness, professional activity and professional growth, and departmental and University service during the three- year term as determined by the Vice President for Academic Affairs. Faculty members might receive these awards many times during their careers, but a recipient will be eligible to hold a new award only after one year has elapsed since the previous award. Holders of a Faculty Fellowship may not apply for a Fisher Fellowship or a Fisher Course Reassignment since the Faculty Fellowship has commitments of time and product that must be completed without delay. Faculty members considering projects that involve technology should consult Faculty Instructional Technology Support (FITS) at least two weeks prior to the application deadline. Types of Faculty Fellowships: There are four areas for which an individual may apply: Teaching/curricular development projects: Proposals in this area might include projects such as the development and teaching of a new area of expertise in the applicant's discipline, which might be shared with colleagues; several changes in courses, involving the addition of effective technology in courses at several levels; developing or reworking courses to incorporate new perspectives and concepts; development of new pedagogical methods, which might be incorporated into several classes and shared with colleagues. Scholarly/creative projects: The projects in this area might include substantive work on a manuscript or major new research; they could include projects in the creative areas as well, such as sustained work on performances or exhibitions. Some examples here include working on a book- length manuscript, a major research project or performance, or preparing an entire new body of artwork for a one- person exhibition. Service projects: Projects involving a substantive idea that would improve an existing program, create something new at De. Pauw, and/or provide a needed complement to support faculty work. Fellowships will not be granted for routine service. Proposals must include a practical plan. Combination projects: Proposals combining any of the three other types may be submitted. It should be detailed and contain a full explanation of the applicant's process and product. Scope of the Project: The breadth of the project should be comparable to that of a one- semester sabbatical; this is a major grant and the resultant project should be worthy of the time and financial investment. The fellow should expect to spend 1. Deadline: Monday, February 22, 2016 by 5pm 1. Purpose and Description. As part of the Aspire 2020 objective to transform the research and creative activity culture at OU, the Arts and Humanities Working Group, through support. Air Force Research Lab Summer Faculty Fellowship Program offers hands-on exposure to Air Force research challenges through 8- to 12-week research residencies at participating Air Force research facilities for full. Administers the Fulbright Scholar Program for university-college faculty and for professionals. Describes specific programs, with country and application information. As part of this Faculty Fellowship. Faculty Fellowship Program has three basic. Ten faculty members from law schools or schools/programs of public health have been selected to participate in a yearlong fellowship. The Harrington Faculty Fellows Program supports approximately five Fellows each academic year. These Fellows visit UT Austin to pursue their research and collaborate with colleagues. The normal period of. This time should be guarded carefully in order to guarantee real progress. There is no expectation that summer time will be expended on this project, but the fellows may work on their projects in the summer if they choose. JPL Graduate Fellowship Program. JPL Faculty Research Program. The JPL Faculty Research Program, or JFRP, provides opportunities for science. In contrast to the larger scope of Faculty Fellowships, summer stipends and Fisher Course Reassignments are generally appropriate to support work on an article or a paper for a professional meeting; similarly, these more limited grants are appropriate for preparation of artwork for a group exhibition. Designing one course would not normally be considered as an adequate project for a Faculty Fellowship. Merit of the Project: Does the proposal show promise of significant achievement in course development, in curricular development or in pedagogy, or does it show promise of a project or product of scholarly/creative importance? In areas of teaching and curricular improvement, the size of the audience or the longevity of the program may be a factor in consideration. Documents or letters of support from colleagues with expertise in the area of the project may strengthen the proposal. Faculty Development may ask for an opinion from another scholar in your field. Unity of the Project: These awards will be granted for a single project requiring and spanning the full three years. Each year could be spent on a different . One cannot apply for three one- year long projects. The Applicant's Qualifications: Applicants should document their expertise in the area of their project. They may do this by submitting work previously done, annotated bibliographies, or a brief statement of their field within the discipline. Procedure for Evaluation: Proposals will be reviewed by each member of Faculty Development using three categories: high, medium, and low. Nasa Faculty Fellowship ProgramIf, in their first reading, the committee members decide that there are not sufficient acceptable proposals for the funding period, they may decide to approve some applications, reject some, and return some applications with comments from the committee. Returned applications may be revised and resubmitted. Ordinarily a maximum of two weeks will be permitted for revision. Under no circumstances, however, will the revised proposals replace the previously approved fellowships. A summary of the committee members’ comments will be returned to the applicant if the proposal is not funded. Reporting Process: For the first two years of the fellowship, a report is due on the first Wednesday in May; the final project report is due on the first Wednesday in September after the third year. Failure to submit a satisfactory report by the deadline or to show adequate progress on a project after either of the first two years could lead to suspension or loss of the fellowship. The final report must be judged acceptable by the committee in order for the faculty member to remain eligible for Faculty Development funding. Each report will be read and commented upon by the Faculty Development Committee, and the fellow will receive a response to the report. Reports should be addressed to the chair of the Faculty Development Committee and should include a narrative outlining the work done and the order in which it was completed. You should refer to the timeline and the yearly product you promised in your original proposal and show how the funding enabled you to meet your goals. Include evidence of the work accomplished toward completion of the product; such evidence might include examples of preliminary data collected, samples of presentation materials, copies of manuscripts in progress, revisions of course syllabi, an annotated bibliography, or a summary of data collected and analyzed. The report should focus on the Faculty Fellowship project; however, other relevant overlapping work should be described as necessary to help the Faculty Development Committee understand what you have done. If the time- line has changed in any way, please explain and submit a revised time- line for the remaining years of the project. When plans or circumstances change along the way, it is the responsibility of the faculty member holding the fellowship to request committee approval of a revised proposal before the change is made. The final report of the fellowship should be a wrap- up of the entire project. Please submit your report electronically to Becky Wallace in the form of a WORD or PDF document. Faculty members who fail to submit reports on time will be ineligible for Faculty Development funding until the report(s) have been submitted and approved.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |